Department of Child and Family Services Shreveport La
BREAKING – 3 studies published by the CDC, UK Government & Oxford University detect the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work
A graduate of Yale University who also obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an Dr. caste from the John Hopkins Academy Schoolhouse of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to take a vaccine is a harmful and damaging act because of splendid scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) published a newspaper on September 9th analysing various studies that were published in August 2021 which bear witness the declared Delta Covid-xix variant is evading the current Covid-nineteen injections on offer and therefore do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
The Physician of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –
- Protect the vaccinated person against the illness
- Proceed vaccinated people from carrying the infection and transmitting it to others.
Still, the Doctor of Medicine writes that herd amnesty will non exist reached through vaccination because new research in multiple settings shows that the declared Delta variant produces very loftier viral loads which are but as high in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.
Therefore, co-ordinate to Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD), vaccine mandates; such every bit the 1 now enforced in the UK for all Care Home staff, have no justification considering vaccinating individuals does not stop or fifty-fifty slow the spread of the declared dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.
Which leads the Doctor of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more protective than vaccination because all severities of Covid-19 illness produce healthy levels of natural immunity.
Nine Pierpont (Doctor, PhD) cites three studies whose findings and data support her conclusions and these include a study published August sixth 2021 in the Centre for Disease Control's (CDC) 'Morbidity and Bloodshed Weekly Report', another report published August 10th 2021 by Oxford University, and a concluding study published August 24th 2021 which was funded past the UK Department for Health and Social Care.
CDC Study
The CDC written report focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two week period. The results found that 346 of the cases were amidst vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with alleged Covid-nineteen symptoms, and 1.2% beingness hospitalised.
However the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with just ane person being hospitalised (0.8%. No deaths occurred in either group. The study also institute that viral loads were establish to be very similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, meaning they were every bit infectious.
Oxford Academy Study
The Oxford University report examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection between March and April 2021. The unabridged hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-19 virus in mid May 2021 all the same, the starting time example amidst the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.
All 900 hospital staff were then retested for the Covid-nineteen virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the hospital into lockdown. Over the next two weeks, 16 boosted cases were identified.
The study establish that 76% of the Covid-xix positive staff adult respiratory symptoms, with 3 staff members developing pneumonia and one staff member requiring three days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads amidst the fully vaccinated infected group were found to be 251 times higher than peak viral loads constitute among the staff in March – April 2020 when they were not vaccinated.
UK Department of Wellness & Social Intendance Study
The Great britain Department of Wellness & Social Care study is an analysis of ongoing population broad SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the UK and includes measures of viral load amid the population.
The study found that viral loads amongst the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are nigh the same, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-xix injection gyre-out. The study likewise found that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.
The authors of the study conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection have lost efficacy against what they claim to be the Delta Covid-19 variant, but they maintain that they are substantially constructive at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the range of 67% to 80%.
Nine Pierpont (Doc, PhD) rightly asks in her paper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the report were fully vaccinated people.
The Medico of Medicine writes –
'If a vaccine reduces the risk of becoming infected by two-thirds (67%), nosotros would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to be less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.
Say nosotros start with 1000 people in the state, of whom nosotros volition randomly sample 100. The land is 80% vaccinated. This means that in our sample of 100 nosotros have 80 vaccinated and twenty unvaccinated people.
Let's say that the virus has infected 10% of the people across the sampling period, or x total cases. If 8 of the infected are among the vaccinated, and 2 in the unvaccinated (80% and twenty% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has fabricated no departure in whether 1 can get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated grouping would be reduced by 2/iii to 2.67 cases, and the full cases would be simply 4.67 cases (2.67 vaccinated and ii unvaccinated).
This means that merely 2.67/4.67 or 57% of the cases would be in the vaccinated group, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (We can go back to 10% overall beingness positive only using ratios, yielding 5.vii cases among the vaccinated and iv.3 amongst the unvaccinated.)
This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the full population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated by the authors.
Information technology appears to me—as in the Massachusetts written report—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere between slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.
The UK written report is articulate that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Alpha, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.'
The above iii studies lead Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) to conclude in her paper that mandating others to take a vaccine is a potentially harmful, damaging act.
She writes that since the principal reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies show beyond a shadow of a doubt that they practise not do this, those who mandate the Covid-nineteen injections may wish to seek legal counsel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting harm to those whom they pressure into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, teaching or society.
Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/12/three-studies-find-the-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-work/
0 Response to "Department of Child and Family Services Shreveport La"
Postar um comentário